Some Thoughts on I think therefore I am
I think therefore I am,
said Rene Descartes. But what about those who can’t think? Those who are
suffering from Alzheimer’s or are in coma or by yogic powers able to control
their thought process. Don’t they exist?
By Descartes’ theory they
don’t. Then how do we classify them? Do we say they don’t exist even though they
do? To me, it doesn’t make sense.
I think therefore I am
is one of the most profound philosophical statements ever made. Yet it is flawed
according to the noted philosopher Nietzsche, who pointed out:
You have to be before
you think – you can’t think first and then say you are.
If Descartes is because
he thinks, then God is because we think. That’s perfectly logical and that’s
what Descartes himself believed. His argument about the existence of God is
based on the following points:
a)
Idea of god is of a perfect being
b)
It is more perfect to exist than not to
exist
c)
Therefore, God must exist
But this argument was challenged
by many during his own lifetime as it has several problems; one of them being:
how it can
be possible for a finite mind to have a clear and distinct idea of an infinite
God?
Also, as
per David Hume, the famous Scottish philosopher, all ideas are created from
experience one way or another and so we have formed the idea of God from
experience by abstraction and negation.
From
antiquity philosophers have argued about the existence of God and till now the debate
continues. But no one seems to have the right answers. If we were to rephrase
Descartes’ statement into I am because someone thought and that someone
is God then that’ll create a new line of argument.
-
NZ
6.7.2019
Comments
Post a Comment